Join Mailing List

For latest news and information about Treasury and Financial Markets, enter your details below:

Recovery & Resolution Plans

Print Preview Send to a Friend Share

Published: 24th May 2012 by William Webster

During the financial crisis we learnt that banks of all sizes can and do fail. What's more disentangling the business in an orderly and timely fashion was made difficult by complexity. What was the conclusion?

Having plans to deal with failure would help in a restructuring without creating undue systemic risk and taxpayer funded support.

With this in mind the FSA produced consultation paper 11/16, feedback statement 12/1 and draft changes to the Financial Stability and Market Confidence Sourcebook.

Register for free or login to view the full publication

Displaying 1 to 5 of 5 results in total.

Related Documents

Registration RequiredResolution 100% relevant

25th March 2017

This is a complex topic and the following is a short high level review of the purpose of resolution.


Payment RequiredCredit spreads 57% relevant

25th March 2017

The following explains what credit spreads are and why they are important. How credit risk occurs in Treasury and what we need to do to manage this risk. The links between credit spreads, bond prices, default probabilities and recovery rates.


Payment RequiredThe Prudential Regulatory Authority 41% relevant

26th February 2013

This explains the role of the PRA in the regulatory regime. The approach is clear. Systemic stability and depositor’s protection is crucial. But this is not a zero failure regime. Boards should note the focus on the governance of risk.


Registration RequiredRegulation > Consultation Paper 08/22 Strengthening liquidity standards December 2008 39% relevant

31st January 2009

This CP sets out the FSA's plans to reform the liquidity regime. It requires firms to undertake a much more rigorous analysis of their liquidity position. This includes the effect of stressed conditions on their business. The firm will submit what it considers to be an appropriate liquidity buffer to the regulator. The FSA will then decide whether it is sufficient. In determining the buffer the FSA will also assess the firm's systems and management. If these are considered weak the buffer will be increased accordingly. The liquidity buffer can only be held in liquid assets. The FSA's view is that this primarily means Gilts, sovereign debt or central bank deposits. The FSA makes it clear, "The responsibility of adopting a sound approach to liquidity risk management is on firms and their senior management".


Payment RequiredCapital 31% relevant

25th March 2017

The following is an introduction to bank regulatory capital. This is the amount of capital that the authorities require a bank to hold. It’s a complex topic and has a lot of interested parties. They include banks, taxpayers, regulators and politicians. That’s because increased capital reduces risk but costs banks and potentially may lead a slowdown in the growth of credit.