Join Mailing List

For latest news and information about Treasury and Financial Markets, enter your details below:

Funding policy - quick guide

Print Preview Send to a Friend Share

Published: 30th July 2010 by William Webster

Wholesale markets can provide longer dated funds with a specific maturity date but this incurs refinancing risk. Furthermore a society that increases its reliance on wholesale funding not only increases its refinancing risk but also reduces the security of its members. This is because although the public sees society deposits as "safe" or even safer than bank deposits they are in fact subordinated.

In accordance with the 1986 Act societies should have a limit whereby at least 50% of funding comes from members' accounts.

Wholesale funding is divided into three categories:

1. Offshore/overseas retail accounts

2. Deposits from non-financial/non-individuals

3. Wholesale market funding

The regulator is expecting boards to impose an overall limit on wholesale funding and sub limits by each category.

The maturity profile of wholesale funding should be staggered so that large portions of funding do not mature at the same time. The FSA applies limits to funding with a maturity of three months or less. These limits are linked to a firm's SDLs.

The FSA expects building societies to make use of the Bank of England Reserve Account in order to manage their buffer requirement.

If you are going to use repo the appropriate risk management needs to be in place. If you are on a matched approach the FSA expects you to talk with them before you do repo. Societies on more sophisticated treasury risk management approaches are free to use repo without approaching the regulator. Firms using repo should obtain full legal advice before agreeing documentation.

The FSA does not expect societies on the Administered or Matched Approaches to have external credit ratings. This is because ratings need careful management and rating changes could leave a society vulnerable.

The FSA provides a detailed table for each treasury approach. This lists the funding instruments and applicable limits.

Where a society differs from its chosen approach it should expect dialogue with the FSA in order to ascertain whether it needs to realign its risks and controls.

For detailed guidance refer to FSA Policy Statement 10/5 A specialist sourcebook for building societies, Section 4 Funding.

Displaying 1 to 6 of 6 results in total.

Related Documents

Free to ViewLiquidity policy - quick guide 100% relevant

30th July 2010

Building societies are expected to have an up to date liquidity policy statement. This will need board approval. What should your liquidity policy contain? NEDs may find this guide helpful.


Payment RequiredRegulation > Policy Statement 09/16 Stengthening liquidity standards October 2009 50% relevant

7th November 2009

Policy Statement 09/16 Strengthening liquidity standards refers to earlier consultation papers CP08/22, CP09/13 and CP09/14 and the comments received. In general whilst the FSA acknowledges many of the issues raised little has altered in the final policy. Firms will be expected to be self sufficient for liquidity purposes. Senior management is responsible for reviewing the level of liquidity, compliance and reporting to the Board. The FSA highlights that many firms have been unable to identify and report contractual cash flows on a regular basis. This will be unacceptable. Non compliance will be treated with regulatory sanction. How a firm is subject to Individual Liquidity Adequacy Standards (ILAS) depends on the size of the firm and the risks it presents. The ILAS framework comprises an Individual Liquidity Adequacy Assessment (ILAA), a Supervisory Liquidity Review Process (SLRP) and Individual Liquidity Guidance (ILG). Firms are obliged in the ILAA to undertake robust stress testing. The purpose of this is to show that the firm fully understands its liquidity risk. ILAS firms will need to report the stress test results in their ILAA. Liquidity management systems, controls and stress testing are all board responsibilities. The ILG is the amount of liquid resources the FSA expects a firm to hold. This will contain "guidance" on the amount of the liquid asset buffer and the firm's funding profile. As an incentive for firms to improve their systems and controls, the FSA will increase the amount of liquidity the firm must hold. Deposits at the central bank and tradable securities issued by the central bank will count towards the buffer. Holding currency denominated bonds should take into account potential problems in the FX market. For this reason a domestic bank with mainly sterling liabilities must hold its buffer in gilts. The FSA now require firms to price the cost of liquidity into products. This should mean that the cost of holding the liquidity buffer is passed on to those customers that create a stressed outflow requirement. The new regime will be phased in. The scope and application of the new rules will depend on the importance of the firm and its ability to create systemic risk.


Payment RequiredMonetary policy 45% relevant

25th March 2017

Central Banks (CB’s) have the role of maintaining monetary and financial stability, they produce bank notes and supervise banks and insurance companies. Financial stability may require them to act as “Lender of last resort” to commercial banks. In this way, they provide facilities that promote confidence in the banking sector and more widely in the value of money. In many cases they are independent of government however some commentators believe government influences their decisions, not least by having a hand in the appointment of senior central bankers. Several tools are used to conduct policy. These are discussed below.


Free to ViewPolicy Statement 10/5 Presentation 44% relevant

28th July 2010

This presentation was delivered to non executive directors of building societies on 27th and 28th July 2010. It is about the new sourcebook and how it affects a society's treasury.


Free to ViewPS 10 5 presentation January 2010 44% relevant

15th January 2010

This presentation is about the introduction of new liquidity standards in the UK. It was delivered to bank and building society executives and NEDs in January 2010.


Registration RequiredNet stable funding ratio 38% relevant

25th March 2017

The NSFR requires banks to maintain stable levels of funding relative to their assets and off-balance sheet liabilities. It is a structural ratio designed to improve both bank and systemic resilience. It is a check on rapid bank balance sheet growth and it discourages banks from holding long term illiquid assets funded through wholesale sources. It is one of two minimum standards (the other being the Liquidity Coverage Ratio which focusses on holding short term high quality assets to meet short term liquidity shocks). To back this up there are a host of liquidity monitoring tools they impose on banks via regulatory reporting.