Join Mailing List

For latest news and information about Treasury and Financial Markets, enter your details below:

Funds Transfer Pricing Review

Print Preview Send to a Friend Share

Published: 18th December 2012 by William Webster

How do you work out your cost of money? Is your FTP proportionate? Does it capture all relevant costs? Do you pass these on to products? Do staff understand why you do it? Is it fair to treasury and the rest of the business? Is there sufficient Board debate?

The Background

FTP completes the circle in liquidity management. It’s about working out the cost of money, identifying what creates liquidity risk and adjusting prices to reflect that risk. It’s also a regulatory requirement and it sounds straight forward. If only real life was so simple! Designing and implementing FTP needs to be proportionate but that doesn’t let smaller firms off the hook.

The Risk

Poor implementation of FTP can lead to a number of problems. Not least it signals to the regulator that management leaves a lot to be desired. This can have direct implications on liquidity buffers and the cost of doing business. It doesn’t end there.  A badly thought through policy can lead to writing business at the wrong price which is an undesirable place to be unless it’s a conscious business decision.

This was Barbican Consulting's solution:

The Proposal

The client had developed its own methodology and now needed an expert evaluation. Why? An independent opinion can draw reference from a wider perspective and in so doing suggest appropriate improvements. It also gives the board comfort that the challenge process is rigorous. It was agreed with the client that in this case a desk top review was the appropriate course of action.

The Outcome

A detailed report including executive summary, the role of FTP, the cost of liquidity, the effect on treasury of FTP methodology, product pricing, margins, effect on business units, new products, board MI and IT integration was prepared. This included recommendations graded by their priority and the recommended implementation period. The flexibility of the approach meant the client saved money on the original development work and only paid for the independent advice required with the report being delivered within a relatively short deadline pending a board review.

Displaying 1 to 6 of 6 results in total.

Related Documents

Free to ViewFunds Transfer Pricing 100% relevant

17th January 2012

Summary: For banks and societies FTP is not an option it's mandatory. Pooled funding is insufficiently granular for the risks that are now apparent. For most firms some type of matched maturity method either using market yields, derived yields or retail funding costs provides the base cost of funding. This needs to be adjusted to include the additional costs you have identified, for example the buffer cost. Each product will have a different set of costs based on the risks that it creates and the costs associated with hedging those risks. Embedding FTP is as important as calculating it. It's an area that's open to regulatory challenge and you need the evidence to back you up. More...

Free to ViewTreasury Consulting > Transfer pricing liquidity risk 82% relevant

16th January 2010

A trader will tell you that there is a simple rule to pricing. The starting point is the cost of hedging.

Free to ViewIs it in your your ILAA? 60% relevant

6th January 2011

The FSA's proposed Dear CEO letter (Review of implementation of systems and controls requirements in liquidity regime dated December 2010) tells you that if it's not in writing it doesn't exist.

Free to ViewValuation adjustments 41% relevant

25th March 2017

XVA refers to several different valuation adjustments that may be applied to derivatives. These adjustments have come about because the 2007/8 crisis caused us to question traditional models used to value trades. For example, the Libor based yield curve became significantly higher than a curve based on a “risk free” rate like the overnight index swap curve. The adjustments include:

Registration RequiredLiquidity 39% relevant

31st March 2014

Liquidity "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." JM Keynes • Definition • Risk drivers • Stress testing • Board responsibility • Days of survival • Buffers • Funds transfer pricing • Outcome

Registration RequiredGovernance > Walker review consultation 25% relevant

1st July 2009

The Walker review A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities This is an independent review led by Sir David Walker into the corporate governance of banks. A consultation document was published on 16th July 2009. There are 39 recommendations. This is a summary.