Join Mailing List

For latest news and information about Treasury and Financial Markets, enter your details below:

Consultation Paper 12 31

Print Preview Send to a Friend Share

Published: 11th January 2013 by William Webster

Removing the simplified ILAS BIPRU firm automatic scalar increase and other minor changes to BIPRU 12.

Although a consultation paper this will provide some comfort to simplified firms. The relevant parts are:

Register for free or login to view the full publication

Displaying 1 to 6 of 6 results in total.

Related Documents

Registration RequiredRegulation > Consultation Paper 09/17: A Specialist Sourcebook for Building Societies June 2009 100% relevant

1st August 2009

The general thrust of the CP is that Societies must prove that they have both the management and the systems capable of effectively dealing with the risks they face. This is part of the enhanced supervisory approach now adopted by the FSA. It states that systems and controls must match the level of complexity in a firm's business model. The FSA will adopt a more interventionist approach in order to ensure this is the case. The proposal is that building societies and the regulator will determine whether the risk management policies adopted are appropriate. Where they are not the Society can either simplify its business or improve its risk management. The FSA also intends to limit societies diversifying their business without a full assessment of capital adequacy. The FSA has considered applying similar CP 17 guidance to the banking sector but has decided on account of the "lack of homogeneity" that this would not be practical and in their case a firm-by-firm approach is more appropriate. The CP addresses treasury and lending. It contains five approaches to treasury management, three areas of treasury guidance and three approaches to lending. Consultation closes on 5th September 2009 with implementation due in early 2010 when a new Building Societies Sourcebook (BSOCS) will replace IPRU-BSOC.


Registration RequiredRegulation > Consultation Paper 08/22 Strengthening liquidity standards December 2008 97% relevant

31st January 2009

This CP sets out the FSA's plans to reform the liquidity regime. It requires firms to undertake a much more rigorous analysis of their liquidity position. This includes the effect of stressed conditions on their business. The firm will submit what it considers to be an appropriate liquidity buffer to the regulator. The FSA will then decide whether it is sufficient. In determining the buffer the FSA will also assess the firm's systems and management. If these are considered weak the buffer will be increased accordingly. The liquidity buffer can only be held in liquid assets. The FSA's view is that this primarily means Gilts, sovereign debt or central bank deposits. The FSA makes it clear, "The responsibility of adopting a sound approach to liquidity risk management is on firms and their senior management".


Registration RequiredRegulation > Consultation Paper 08/24 Stress and scenario testing December 2008 97% relevant

12th April 2009

The FSA wants to see more stress and scenario testing in firms. Senior management should be involved. Previous assumptions have been too relaxed. Stress testing should be in detail with the mitigating actions rehearsed. Reverse stress testing is introduced as a method of identifying critical events. The FSA is not going to tell you how to do this, it's up to you. However firms can expect greater challenge on the assumptions made.


Free to ViewDiscussion Paper 10/4 67% relevant

3rd September 2010

This DP raises questions about the capital charge for trading books. Look more closely and you will find that the regulation of investment banking by the FSA is ineffective. Furthermore there is no reason to think that in the future it will improve. Investment banks will continue to run risks that periodically threaten their solvency. Their current interconnection with the retail deposit business means government support is guaranteed. A pragmatic solution would be to disentangle investment banking from the retail business. This free market approach is much favoured by investment bankers for other industries. Good business flourishes and bad ones die without placing a burden on the taxpayer. Now let's see why regulation won't protect us.


Registration RequiredGovernance > Walker review consultation 53% relevant

1st July 2009

The Walker review A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities This is an independent review led by Sir David Walker into the corporate governance of banks. A consultation document was published on 16th July 2009. There are 39 recommendations. This is a summary.


Free to ViewLiquidity Swaps 52% relevant

4th August 2011

Put a bank that has difficulty in raising liquidity in a room with an insurance company that's looking for yield and what do you get?