Telephone: +44 (0)20 7920 9128
Email: info@barbicanconsulting.co.uk
Web: www.barbicanconsulting.co.uk
Main Navigation:
Sub-navigation:
Published: 16th November 2010 by William Webster
On 9th November 2010 the FSA issued proposed guidance on the Individual Liquidity Systems Assessment (ILSA) Submission Information.
It is a revised version of a document released earlier this year and attempts to clarify what's required. If you are putting together your ILSA the following may help:
The FSA periodically reviews liquidity. This is called the Supervisory Liquidity Review Process (SLRP). It can occur at any time or as part of the ARROW process. This is when the FSA will ask for your ILSA. It will be used in order to form judgment on whether your liquidity risk is appropriately managed. If the regulator determines that the simplified buffer requirement (refer to BIPRU 12.6.9R and 12.6.17G) does not adequately cover your liquidity risk the Board will be given an Individual Liquidity Guidance (ILG). This will require you to hold more in the buffer.
You may think that just complying with the simplified buffer requirement is enough but this misses the point. The ILSA is also a document that should be used by the Board to help it understand the liquidity risks the firm faces and how in times of stress those risks can be effectively dealt with. A poorly drafted ILSA puts you at risk. It exposes weak governance and risk management and is more likely to lead to an ILG.
Whilst the FSA expects the ILSA to be "proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of a firm's activities" do not get caught out. Running "ILSA Lite" will invite questions.
The FSA's proposed structure and format for the ILSA is not ideal. However from my experience you would be advised to follow it. Sometimes that's not as easy as it sounds and you can miss things out. So what could you reasonably expect to find in your ILSA?
Using the original headings the following is a cut down version of key items in the Guidance. Does your ILSA stand up to scrutiny?
Section 1: Executive Summary
Section 2: ILSA Systems & Controls
Part 1 Background
Part 2 Current & projected financial and liquidity positions
Part 3 Liquidity control environment
a. Risk appetite, liquidity risk limits and positions against limits
b. Timing
c. Risk analysis
d. Stress testing
e. Contingency funding plans
f. Management information
Part 4 Liquidity adequacy
Part 5 Diversification
Part 6 Internal challenge and approval
Part 7 Using the ILSA in the Firm
Section 3 - Appendices
Conclusion
The ILSA is all about how you manage your liquidity risk. This involves behaviour and assumptions and it's not straight forward.
When in doubt the simple answer is just to increase the buffer. That's why running "ILSA lite" may prove more expensive than you anticipate.
Displaying 1 to 5 of 5 results in total.
29th April 2011
It's the 5th May 2011 and I've just received an email from the FSA reminding me that the Individual Liquidity Systems Assessment (ILSA) Finalised Guidance is now available. This may not mean much to you. That's unless you fall under the simplified liquidity regime in the UK. The FSA's guidance is about what they expect to see and the good news is it's a far better document than its predecessors. So what does the FSA expect?
19th November 2010
Letter 17th November 2010 to the FSA regarding Guidance consultation Individual Liquidity Systems Assessment (ILSA) - Simplified ILAS BIPRU Firms November 2010.
9th January 2011
An Individual Liquidity Systems Assessment (ILSA) is something that Simplified ILAS BIPRU Firms must prepare. It explains how liquidity risk is managed. For some firms it's a shock and time and resources can get stretched. Read how one client found the answer.
2nd April 2009
This presentation is about treasury, management information and training for boards. It was presented to executives and NEDs of banks and building societies in April 2009.
23rd November 2010
Is a two tier liquidity regime in place? At a conference in January 2010 I warned that firms on the simplified ILAS regime could find it worked against them. My premise was as follows.